Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGAFX vs SPFCX
RGAFX vs SPFCX Comparison
Open Charts RGAFX vs SPFCX
RGAFX vs SPFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGAFX vs. SPFCX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGAFX is a Buy and SPFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. SPFCX (1.67B). RGAFX pays higher dividends than SPFCX: RGAFX (0.46) vs SPFCX (0.00). RGAFX was incepted earlier than SPFCX: RGAFX (24 years) vs SPFCX (26 years). SPFCX (1.84) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). RGAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. SPFCX (30.00). RGAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than SPFCX: RGAFX (250) vs SPFCX (1000). RGAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.42 vs. SPFCX (0.00). RGAFX return over 5 years is better than : 14.74 vs. SPFCX (2.89).
| RGAFX | SPFCX | RGAFX / SPFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 1.78 | 19% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 1.84 | 18% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.276 | 3.867 | 240% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 353B | 1.67B | 21,138% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.46 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.42 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.36 | 61.44 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.74 | 2.89 | 511% |
| Returns for 10 years | 109.80 | 93.09 | 118% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers