Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGAFX vs TWCIX
RGAFX vs TWCIX Comparison
Open Charts RGAFX vs TWCIX
RGAFX vs TWCIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGAFX vs. TWCIX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGAFX is a Hold and TWCIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. TWCIX (6.36B). RGAFX pays higher dividends than TWCIX: RGAFX (0.46) vs TWCIX (0.00). RGAFX was incepted earlier than TWCIX: RGAFX (24 years) vs TWCIX (55 years). TWCIX (0.98) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). RGAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. TWCIX (22.00). RGAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than TWCIX: RGAFX (250) vs TWCIX (2500). TWCIX (13.02) and RGAFX (12.49) have marching annual gain over last year. RGAFX (20.71) and TWCIX (19.94) have equivalent 5 years return.
| RGAFX | TWCIX | RGAFX / TWCIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 0.90 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 0.98 | 35% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 55 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.854 | 5.007 | 177% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 361B | 6.36B | 5,675% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.46 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.49 | 13.02 | 96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.06 | 41.56 | 120% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.71 | 19.94 | 104% |
| Returns for 10 years | 121.55 | 149.45 | 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement