Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGAFX vs TWCUX
RGAFX vs TWCUX Comparison
Open Charts RGAFX vs TWCUX
RGAFX vs TWCUX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGAFX vs. TWCUX commentary
Sep 21, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGAFX is a Hold and TWCUX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. TWCUX (25.8B). RGAFX pays higher dividends than TWCUX: RGAFX (0.46) vs TWCUX (0.00). RGAFX was incepted earlier than TWCUX: RGAFX (24 years) vs TWCUX (45 years). TWCUX (0.87) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). RGAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. TWCUX (15.00). RGAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than TWCUX: RGAFX (250) vs TWCUX (2500). RGAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.76 vs. TWCUX (-4.08). RGAFX return over 5 years is better than : 14.41 vs. TWCUX (9.06).
| RGAFX | TWCUX | RGAFX / TWCUX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 0.87 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 0.87 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 45 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.015 | 4.792 | 188% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 353B | 25.8B | 1,368% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.46 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.76 | -4.08 | 19% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.80 | 37.56 | 122% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.41 | 9.06 | 159% |
| Returns for 10 years | 107.60 | 173.98 | 62% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement