Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGAFX vs TWCUX
RGAFX vs TWCUX Comparison
Open Charts RGAFX vs TWCUX
RGAFX vs TWCUX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGAFX vs. TWCUX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGAFX is a Hold and TWCUX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. TWCUX (26.6B). RGAFX pays higher dividends than TWCUX: RGAFX (0.46) vs TWCUX (0.00). RGAFX was incepted earlier than TWCUX: RGAFX (24 years) vs TWCUX (45 years). TWCUX (0.89) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). RGAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. TWCUX (15.00). RGAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than TWCUX: RGAFX (250) vs TWCUX (2500). RGAFX (8.96) and TWCUX (8.71) have marching annual gain over last year. TWCUX (17.78) and RGAFX (17.20) have equivalent 5 years return.
| RGAFX | TWCUX | RGAFX / TWCUX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 0.87 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 0.89 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 45 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.478 | 5.302 | 122% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 361B | 26.6B | 1,357% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.46 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.96 | 8.71 | 103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.79 | 39.30 | 119% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.20 | 17.78 | 97% |
| Returns for 10 years | 116.72 | 196.83 | 59% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement