Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGAFX vs WSACX
RGAFX vs WSACX Comparison
Open Charts RGAFX vs WSACX
RGAFX vs WSACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGAFX vs. WSACX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGAFX is a StrongBuy and WSACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 342B vs. WSACX (76.7M). RGAFX pays higher dividends than WSACX: RGAFX (0.48) vs WSACX (0.00). RGAFX was incepted earlier than WSACX: RGAFX (24 years) vs WSACX (32 years). WSACX (1.32) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). RGAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. WSACX (20.39). RGAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WSACX: RGAFX (250) vs WSACX (5000). WSACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.30 vs. RGAFX (5.92). WSACX return over 5 years is better than : 28.23 vs. RGAFX (18.79).
| RGAFX | WSACX | RGAFX / WSACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 1.32 | 26% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 1.32 | 26% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.612 | 15.023 | 64% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 5000 | 5% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 342B | 76.7M | 445,893% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.92 | 28.30 | 21% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.73 | 67.43 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.79 | 28.23 | 67% |
| Returns for 10 years | 104.75 | 52.56 | 199% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers