Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGAFX vs WSACX
RGAFX vs WSACX Comparison
Open Charts RGAFX vs WSACX
RGAFX vs WSACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGAFX vs. WSACX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGAFX is a Buy and WSACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. WSACX (75.8M). RGAFX pays higher dividends than WSACX: RGAFX (0.46) vs WSACX (0.00). RGAFX was incepted earlier than WSACX: RGAFX (24 years) vs WSACX (32 years). WSACX (1.32) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). RGAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. WSACX (20.39). RGAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WSACX: RGAFX (250) vs WSACX (5000). WSACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.78 vs. RGAFX (0.42). WSACX return over 5 years is better than : 23.79 vs. RGAFX (14.74).
| RGAFX | WSACX | RGAFX / WSACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 1.32 | 26% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 1.32 | 26% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.276 | 13.924 | 67% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 5000 | 5% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 353B | 75.8M | 465,699% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.46 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.42 | 20.78 | 2% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.36 | 63.58 | 70% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.74 | 23.79 | 62% |
| Returns for 10 years | 109.80 | 56.88 | 193% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers