Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGAGX vs RWGFX
RGAGX vs RWGFX Comparison
Open Charts RGAGX vs RWGFX
RGAGX vs RWGFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGAGX vs. RWGFX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGAGX is a Hold and RWGFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 338B vs. RWGFX (27.2M). RGAGX pays higher dividends than RWGFX: RGAGX (0.51) vs RWGFX (0.00). RGAGX was incepted earlier than RWGFX: RGAGX (17 years) vs RWGFX (16 years). RWGFX (1.29) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.29). RGAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. RWGFX (23.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWGFX: RGAGX (250) vs RWGFX (1000). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.41 vs. RWGFX (-1.81). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 27.14 vs. RWGFX (-13.69).
| RGAGX | RWGFX | RGAGX / RWGFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 1.25 | 23% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 1.29 | 22% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.599 | 3.081 | 344% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 338B | 27.2M | 1,242,647% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.41 | -1.81 | -854% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.31 | 15.08 | 367% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.14 | -13.69 | -198% |
| Returns for 10 years | 117.06 | -73.28 | -160% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers