Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGAGX vs SBRAX
RGAGX vs SBRAX Comparison
Open Charts RGAGX vs SBRAX
RGAGX vs SBRAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGAGX vs. SBRAX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGAGX is a Buy and SBRAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. SBRAX (47.4M). RGAGX pays higher dividends than SBRAX: RGAGX (0.51) vs SBRAX (0.04). RGAGX was incepted earlier than SBRAX: RGAGX (17 years) vs SBRAX (7 years). SBRAX (2.07) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.29). SBRAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. RGAGX (32.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than SBRAX: RGAGX (250) vs SBRAX (2500). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.75 vs. SBRAX (-7.84). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 17.74 vs. SBRAX (-24.92).
| RGAGX | SBRAX | RGAGX / SBRAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 0.99 | 29% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 2.07 | 14% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.335 | 12.301 | 60% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 357B | 47.4M | 753,165% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 0.04 | 1,415% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.75 | -7.84 | -61% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.00 | -6.82 | -601% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.74 | -24.92 | -71% |
| Returns for 10 years | 106.44 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement