Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGAGX vs SBRAX
RGAGX vs SBRAX Comparison
Open Charts RGAGX vs SBRAX
RGAGX vs SBRAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGAGX vs. SBRAX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGAGX is a Hold and SBRAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. SBRAX (48.8M). RGAGX pays higher dividends than SBRAX: RGAGX (0.51) vs SBRAX (0.04). RGAGX was incepted earlier than SBRAX: RGAGX (17 years) vs SBRAX (7 years). SBRAX (2.07) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.29). SBRAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. RGAGX (32.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than SBRAX: RGAGX (250) vs SBRAX (2500). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.05 vs. SBRAX (-6.72). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 17.49 vs. SBRAX (-24.00).
| RGAGX | SBRAX | RGAGX / SBRAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 0.99 | 29% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 2.07 | 14% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.516 | 11.383 | 57% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 361B | 48.8M | 739,754% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 0.04 | 1,387% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.05 | -6.72 | -135% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.07 | -4.00 | -1,175% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.49 | -24.00 | -73% |
| Returns for 10 years | 117.26 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement