Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGAGX vs SBRAX
RGAGX vs SBRAX Comparison
Open Charts RGAGX vs SBRAX
RGAGX vs SBRAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGAGX vs. SBRAX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGAGX is a Buy and SBRAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. SBRAX (44.7M). RGAGX pays higher dividends than SBRAX: RGAGX (0.51) vs SBRAX (0.04). RGAGX was incepted earlier than SBRAX: RGAGX (17 years) vs SBRAX (7 years). SBRAX (2.07) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.29). SBRAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. RGAGX (32.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than SBRAX: RGAGX (250) vs SBRAX (2500). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.49 vs. SBRAX (-10.87). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 15.00 vs. SBRAX (-28.68).
| RGAGX | SBRAX | RGAGX / SBRAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 0.99 | 29% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 2.07 | 14% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.321 | 12.852 | 73% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 353B | 44.7M | 789,709% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 0.04 | 1,442% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.49 | -10.87 | -4% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.65 | -5.36 | -832% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.00 | -28.68 | -52% |
| Returns for 10 years | 110.30 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers