Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGAGX vs SBRAX
RGAGX vs SBRAX Comparison
Open Charts RGAGX vs SBRAX
RGAGX vs SBRAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGAGX vs. SBRAX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGAGX is a Hold and SBRAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. SBRAX (48.8M). RGAGX pays higher dividends than SBRAX: RGAGX (0.51) vs SBRAX (0.04). RGAGX was incepted earlier than SBRAX: RGAGX (17 years) vs SBRAX (7 years). SBRAX (2.07) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.29). SBRAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. RGAGX (32.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than SBRAX: RGAGX (250) vs SBRAX (2500). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.55 vs. SBRAX (-5.68). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 20.99 vs. SBRAX (-23.24).
| RGAGX | SBRAX | RGAGX / SBRAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 0.99 | 29% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 2.07 | 14% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.887 | 11.750 | 76% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 361B | 48.8M | 739,754% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 0.04 | 1,387% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.55 | -5.68 | -221% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.34 | -3.69 | -1,365% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.99 | -23.24 | -90% |
| Returns for 10 years | 122.10 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement