Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGAGX vs SCGSX
RGAGX vs SCGSX Comparison
Open Charts RGAGX vs SCGSX
RGAGX vs SCGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGAGX vs. SCGSX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGAGX is a Hold and SCGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. SCGSX (2.22B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than SCGSX: RGAGX (0.51) vs SCGSX (0.00). RGAGX was incepted earlier than SCGSX: RGAGX (17 years) vs SCGSX (26 years). SCGSX (0.66) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.29). RGAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. SCGSX (13.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than SCGSX: RGAGX (250) vs SCGSX (2500). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.55 vs. SCGSX (7.21). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 20.99 vs. SCGSX (9.18).
| RGAGX | SCGSX | RGAGX / SCGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 0.66 | 44% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 0.66 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.887 | 4.399 | 202% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 361B | 2.22B | 16,232% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.55 | 7.21 | 174% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.34 | 32.37 | 156% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.99 | 9.18 | 229% |
| Returns for 10 years | 122.10 | 106.08 | 115% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement