Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGAGX vs SGRNX
RGAGX vs SGRNX Comparison
Open Charts RGAGX vs SGRNX
RGAGX vs SGRNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGAGX vs. SGRNX commentary
Jun 21, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGAGX is a Hold and SGRNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. SGRNX (3.15B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than SGRNX: RGAGX (0.51) vs SGRNX (0.00). RGAGX was incepted earlier than SGRNX: RGAGX (17 years) vs SGRNX (26 years). SGRNX (0.86) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.29). SGRNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 73.00 vs. RGAGX (32.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than SGRNX: RGAGX (250) vs SGRNX (1000000). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.74 vs. SGRNX (-2.86). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 23.74 vs. SGRNX (-27.51).
| RGAGX | SGRNX | RGAGX / SGRNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 0.75 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 0.86 | 34% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.458 | 6.998 | 135% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 361B | 3.15B | 11,453% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.74 | -2.86 | -445% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.47 | 10.13 | 469% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.74 | -27.51 | -86% |
| Returns for 10 years | 117.20 | -0.86 | -13,580% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement