Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGAGX vs SLCCX
RGAGX vs SLCCX Comparison
Open Charts RGAGX vs SLCCX
RGAGX vs SLCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGAGX vs. SLCCX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGAGX is a Buy and SLCCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. SLCCX (9.84B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than SLCCX: RGAGX (0.51) vs SLCCX (0.00). RGAGX was incepted earlier than SLCCX: RGAGX (17 years) vs SLCCX (29 years). SLCCX (1.73) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.29). RGAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. SLCCX (22.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than SLCCX: RGAGX (250) vs SLCCX (1000). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.75 vs. SLCCX (-11.34). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 17.74 vs. SLCCX (-32.14).
| RGAGX | SLCCX | RGAGX / SLCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 1.73 | 17% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 1.73 | 17% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.335 | 1.892 | 388% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 357B | 9.84B | 3,628% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.75 | -11.34 | -42% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.00 | -3.37 | -1,218% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.74 | -32.14 | -55% |
| Returns for 10 years | 106.44 | 26.07 | 408% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement