Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGAGX vs SLCCX
RGAGX vs SLCCX Comparison
Open Charts RGAGX vs SLCCX
RGAGX vs SLCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGAGX vs. SLCCX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGAGX is a Buy and SLCCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. SLCCX (9.38B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than SLCCX: RGAGX (0.51) vs SLCCX (0.00). RGAGX was incepted earlier than SLCCX: RGAGX (17 years) vs SLCCX (29 years). SLCCX (1.73) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.29). RGAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. SLCCX (22.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than SLCCX: RGAGX (250) vs SLCCX (1000). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.49 vs. SLCCX (-14.10). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 15.00 vs. SLCCX (-34.64).
| RGAGX | SLCCX | RGAGX / SLCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 1.73 | 17% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 1.73 | 17% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.321 | 0.669 | 1,392% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 353B | 9.38B | 3,762% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.49 | -14.10 | -3% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.65 | -2.01 | -2,220% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.00 | -34.64 | -43% |
| Returns for 10 years | 110.30 | 24.83 | 444% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement