Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGAGX vs SSGFX
RGAGX vs SSGFX Comparison
Open Charts RGAGX vs SSGFX
RGAGX vs SSGFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGAGX vs. SSGFX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGAGX is a Hold and SSGFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. SSGFX (80.6M). RGAGX pays higher dividends than SSGFX: RGAGX (0.51) vs SSGFX (0.00). RGAGX was incepted earlier than SSGFX: RGAGX (17 years) vs SSGFX (39 years). SSGFX (0.98) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.29). RGAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. SSGFX (8.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGFX: RGAGX (250) vs SSGFX (1000). SSGFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.17 vs. RGAGX (12.55). SSGFX return over 5 years is better than : 43.38 vs. RGAGX (20.99).
| RGAGX | SSGFX | RGAGX / SSGFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 0.98 | 30% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 0.98 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 39 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.887 | 6.028 | 147% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 361B | 80.6M | 447,891% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.55 | 19.17 | 65% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.34 | 58.90 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.99 | 43.38 | 48% |
| Returns for 10 years | 122.10 | 210.03 | 58% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement