Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGAGX vs SSTFX
RGAGX vs SSTFX Comparison
Open Charts RGAGX vs SSTFX
RGAGX vs SSTFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGAGX vs. SSTFX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGAGX is a Hold and SSTFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 338B vs. SSTFX (687M). RGAGX pays higher dividends than SSTFX: RGAGX (0.51) vs SSTFX (0.00). RGAGX was incepted earlier than SSTFX: RGAGX (17 years) vs SSTFX (29 years). SSTFX (2.01) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.29). RGAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. SSTFX (12.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSTFX: RGAGX (250) vs SSTFX (2500). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.41 vs. SSTFX (-4.64). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 27.14 vs. SSTFX (-44.72).
| RGAGX | SSTFX | RGAGX / SSTFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 2.01 | 14% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 2.01 | 14% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.599 | 7.605 | 139% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 338B | 687M | 49,199% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.41 | -4.64 | -332% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.31 | 0.29 | 19,248% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.14 | -44.72 | -61% |
| Returns for 10 years | 117.06 | -8.00 | -1,464% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement