Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGAGX vs STDFX
RGAGX vs STDFX Comparison
Open Charts RGAGX vs STDFX
RGAGX vs STDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGAGX vs. STDFX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGAGX is a Buy and STDFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. STDFX (930M). RGAGX pays higher dividends than STDFX: RGAGX (0.51) vs STDFX (0.00). RGAGX was incepted earlier than STDFX: RGAGX (17 years) vs STDFX (16 years). STDFX (1.10) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.29). STDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RGAGX (32.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than STDFX: RGAGX (250) vs STDFX (1000000). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.49 vs. STDFX (-12.40). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 15.00 vs. STDFX (-25.61).
| RGAGX | STDFX | RGAGX / STDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 0.94 | 31% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 1.10 | 26% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.321 | 3.897 | 239% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 353B | 930M | 37,957% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.49 | -12.40 | -4% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.65 | 7.40 | 603% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.00 | -25.61 | -59% |
| Returns for 10 years | 110.30 | -5.28 | -2,088% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers