Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGAGX vs STDFX
RGAGX vs STDFX Comparison
Open Charts RGAGX vs STDFX
RGAGX vs STDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGAGX vs. STDFX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGAGX is a Buy and STDFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. STDFX (953M). RGAGX pays higher dividends than STDFX: RGAGX (0.51) vs STDFX (0.00). RGAGX was incepted earlier than STDFX: RGAGX (17 years) vs STDFX (16 years). STDFX (1.10) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.29). STDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RGAGX (32.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than STDFX: RGAGX (250) vs STDFX (1000000). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.75 vs. STDFX (-5.16). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 17.74 vs. STDFX (-23.60).
| RGAGX | STDFX | RGAGX / STDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 0.94 | 31% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 1.10 | 26% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.335 | 4.238 | 173% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 357B | 953M | 37,461% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.75 | -5.16 | -92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.00 | 6.81 | 602% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.74 | -23.60 | -75% |
| Returns for 10 years | 106.44 | -5.97 | -1,782% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement