Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGAGX vs STFFX
RGAGX vs STFFX Comparison
Open Charts RGAGX vs STFFX
RGAGX vs STFFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGAGX vs. STFFX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGAGX is a Hold and STFFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 338B vs. STFFX (995M). RGAGX pays higher dividends than STFFX: RGAGX (0.51) vs STFFX (0.00). RGAGX was incepted earlier than STFFX: RGAGX (17 years) vs STFFX (14 years). STFFX (0.75) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.29). STFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RGAGX (32.00). STFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAGX: STFFX (0) vs RGAGX (250). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.41 vs. STFFX (5.32). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 27.14 vs. STFFX (-8.90).
| RGAGX | STFFX | RGAGX / STFFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 0.60 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 0.75 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.599 | 7.281 | 146% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 338B | 995M | 33,970% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.41 | 5.32 | 290% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.31 | 21.37 | 259% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.14 | -8.90 | -305% |
| Returns for 10 years | 117.06 | 6.64 | 1,763% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers