Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGAGX vs STFFX
RGAGX vs STFFX Comparison
Open Charts RGAGX vs STFFX
RGAGX vs STFFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGAGX vs. STFFX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGAGX is a Hold and STFFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. STFFX (942M). RGAGX pays higher dividends than STFFX: RGAGX (0.51) vs STFFX (0.00). RGAGX was incepted earlier than STFFX: RGAGX (17 years) vs STFFX (14 years). STFFX (0.75) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.29). STFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RGAGX (32.00). STFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAGX: STFFX (0) vs RGAGX (250). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.55 vs. STFFX (1.09). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 20.99 vs. STFFX (-17.35).
| RGAGX | STFFX | RGAGX / STFFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 0.60 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 0.75 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.887 | 3.285 | 271% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 361B | 942M | 38,323% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.55 | 1.09 | 1,156% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.34 | 14.10 | 357% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.99 | -17.35 | -121% |
| Returns for 10 years | 122.10 | 7.61 | 1,604% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers