Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGAGX vs STNFX
RGAGX vs STNFX Comparison
Open Charts RGAGX vs STNFX
RGAGX vs STNFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGAGX vs. STNFX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGAGX is a Hold and STNFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. STNFX (942M). RGAGX pays higher dividends than STNFX: RGAGX (0.51) vs STNFX (0.00). RGAGX was incepted earlier than STNFX: RGAGX (17 years) vs STNFX (16 years). STNFX (0.85) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.29). STNFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RGAGX (32.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than STNFX: RGAGX (250) vs STNFX (1000000). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.55 vs. STNFX (0.73). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 20.99 vs. STNFX (-18.52).
| RGAGX | STNFX | RGAGX / STNFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 0.70 | 41% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 0.85 | 34% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.887 | 3.241 | 274% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 361B | 942M | 38,323% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.55 | 0.73 | 1,720% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.34 | 13.00 | 387% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.99 | -18.52 | -113% |
| Returns for 10 years | 122.10 | 5.36 | 2,279% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement