Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGAGX vs TGFRX
RGAGX vs TGFRX Comparison
Open Charts RGAGX vs TGFRX
RGAGX vs TGFRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGAGX vs. TGFRX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGAGX is a Hold and TGFRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 338B vs. TGFRX (39.7M). RGAGX pays higher dividends than TGFRX: RGAGX (0.51) vs TGFRX (0.00). RGAGX was incepted earlier than TGFRX: RGAGX (17 years) vs TGFRX (27 years). TGFRX (1.95) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.29). RGAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. TGFRX (23.35). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than TGFRX: RGAGX (250) vs TGFRX (2000). TGFRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 41.06 vs. RGAGX (15.41). TGFRX return over 5 years is better than : 62.20 vs. RGAGX (27.14).
| RGAGX | TGFRX | RGAGX / TGFRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 1.95 | 15% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 1.95 | 15% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.599 | 16.291 | 65% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 338B | 39.7M | 851,385% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.41 | 41.06 | 38% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.31 | 103.17 | 54% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.14 | 62.20 | 44% |
| Returns for 10 years | 117.06 | 226.88 | 52% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers