Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGAGX vs TGWFX
RGAGX vs TGWFX Comparison
Open Charts RGAGX vs TGWFX
RGAGX vs TGWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGAGX vs. TGWFX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGAGX is a Hold and TGWFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 338B vs. TGWFX (370M). RGAGX pays higher dividends than TGWFX: RGAGX (0.51) vs TGWFX (0.00). RGAGX was incepted earlier than TGWFX: RGAGX (17 years) vs TGWFX (26 years). TGWFX (0.97) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.29). TGWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RGAGX (32.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than TGWFX: RGAGX (250) vs TGWFX (5000). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.41 vs. TGWFX (-12.17). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 27.14 vs. TGWFX (-30.33).
| RGAGX | TGWFX | RGAGX / TGWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 0.90 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 0.97 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.599 | 6.457 | 164% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 5000 | 5% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 338B | 370M | 91,351% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.41 | -12.17 | -127% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.31 | 21.27 | 260% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.14 | -30.33 | -89% |
| Returns for 10 years | 117.06 | 36.20 | 323% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement