Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGAGX vs TRSAX
RGAGX vs TRSAX Comparison
Open Charts RGAGX vs TRSAX
RGAGX vs TRSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGAGX vs. TRSAX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGAGX is a Hold and TRSAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. TRSAX (49.8B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than TRSAX: RGAGX (0.51) vs TRSAX (0.00). RGAGX was incepted earlier than TRSAX: RGAGX (17 years) vs TRSAX (24 years). TRSAX (0.92) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.29). TRSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.20 vs. RGAGX (32.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRSAX: RGAGX (250) vs TRSAX (2500). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.55 vs. TRSAX (4.73). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 20.99 vs. TRSAX (-2.20).
| RGAGX | TRSAX | RGAGX / TRSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 0.92 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 0.92 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.887 | 3.397 | 262% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 361B | 49.8B | 725% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.55 | 4.73 | 265% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.34 | 37.15 | 135% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.99 | -2.20 | -952% |
| Returns for 10 years | 122.10 | 118.31 | 103% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers