Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGAGX vs TWCAX
RGAGX vs TWCAX Comparison
Open Charts RGAGX vs TWCAX
RGAGX vs TWCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGAGX vs. TWCAX commentary
Jul 27, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGAGX is a Hold and TWCAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. TWCAX (6B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than TWCAX: RGAGX (0.51) vs TWCAX (0.00). RGAGX was incepted earlier than TWCAX: RGAGX (17 years) vs TWCAX (29 years). TWCAX (1.23) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.29). RGAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. TWCAX (22.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than TWCAX: RGAGX (250) vs TWCAX (2500). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.10 vs. TWCAX (-1.79). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 12.42 vs. TWCAX (3.72).
| RGAGX | TWCAX | RGAGX / TWCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 1.15 | 25% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 1.23 | 24% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.984 | -0.942 | -423% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 357B | 6B | 5,951% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.10 | -1.79 | 5% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.14 | 26.11 | 138% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.42 | 3.72 | 334% |
| Returns for 10 years | 99.76 | 109.37 | 91% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement