Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGAGX vs TWCAX
RGAGX vs TWCAX Comparison
Open Charts RGAGX vs TWCAX
RGAGX vs TWCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGAGX vs. TWCAX commentary
Jul 06, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGAGX is a Hold and TWCAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. TWCAX (6.31B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than TWCAX: RGAGX (0.51) vs TWCAX (0.00). RGAGX was incepted earlier than TWCAX: RGAGX (17 years) vs TWCAX (29 years). TWCAX (1.23) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.29). RGAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. TWCAX (22.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than TWCAX: RGAGX (250) vs TWCAX (2500). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.50 vs. TWCAX (4.56). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 17.64 vs. TWCAX (11.04).
| RGAGX | TWCAX | RGAGX / TWCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 1.15 | 25% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 1.23 | 24% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.055 | 2.618 | 308% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 361B | 6.31B | 5,722% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.50 | 4.56 | 143% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.31 | 33.43 | 136% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.64 | 11.04 | 160% |
| Returns for 10 years | 114.06 | 125.63 | 91% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement