Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGAGX vs TWCIX
RGAGX vs TWCIX Comparison
Open Charts RGAGX vs TWCIX
RGAGX vs TWCIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGAGX vs. TWCIX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGAGX is a Buy and TWCIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. TWCIX (6.16B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than TWCIX: RGAGX (0.51) vs TWCIX (0.00). RGAGX was incepted earlier than TWCIX: RGAGX (17 years) vs TWCIX (55 years). TWCIX (0.98) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.29). RGAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. TWCIX (22.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than TWCIX: RGAGX (250) vs TWCIX (2500). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.49 vs. TWCIX (-2.04). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 15.00 vs. TWCIX (10.46).
| RGAGX | TWCIX | RGAGX / TWCIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 0.90 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 0.98 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 55 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.321 | 3.742 | 249% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 353B | 6.16B | 5,731% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.49 | -2.04 | -24% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.65 | 36.10 | 124% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.00 | 10.46 | 143% |
| Returns for 10 years | 110.30 | 132.68 | 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement