Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGAGX vs TWCUX
RGAGX vs TWCUX Comparison
Open Charts RGAGX vs TWCUX
RGAGX vs TWCUX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGAGX vs. TWCUX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGAGX is a Hold and TWCUX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. TWCUX (26.6B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than TWCUX: RGAGX (0.51) vs TWCUX (0.00). RGAGX was incepted earlier than TWCUX: RGAGX (17 years) vs TWCUX (45 years). TWCUX (0.89) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.29). RGAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. TWCUX (15.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than TWCUX: RGAGX (250) vs TWCUX (2500). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.55 vs. TWCUX (8.71). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 20.99 vs. TWCUX (17.78).
| RGAGX | TWCUX | RGAGX / TWCUX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 0.87 | 33% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 0.89 | 33% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 45 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.887 | 5.302 | 168% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 361B | 26.6B | 1,357% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.55 | 8.71 | 144% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.34 | 39.30 | 128% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.99 | 17.78 | 118% |
| Returns for 10 years | 122.10 | 196.83 | 62% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement