Ad is loading...
RGAGX vs USLCX
RGAGX vs USLCX Comparison
Open Charts RGAGX vs USLCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$69.67
Change+$1.73 (+2.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets267.42B
JHancock U.S. Global Leaders Growth C
Price$40.81
Change+$0.98 (+2.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.88B
RGAGX vs USLCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGAGX vs. USLCX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGAGX is a StrongBuy and USLCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 267B vs. USLCX (1.88B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than USLCX: RGAGX (0.71) vs USLCX (0.00). RGAGX was incepted earlier than USLCX: RGAGX (16 years) vs USLCX (23 years). USLCX (1.89) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.30). USLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. RGAGX (25.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than USLCX: RGAGX (250) vs USLCX (1000). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.92 vs. USLCX (-17.93). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 46.21 vs. USLCX (-2.21).
| RGAGX | USLCX | RGAGX / USLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 1.88 | 16% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 1.89 | 16% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.546 | -9.312 | 70% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 267B | 1.88B | 14,187% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.71 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.92 | -17.93 | -11% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.28 | -3.95 | -386% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.21 | -2.21 | -2,091% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.70 | 5.51 | 1,011% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...