Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGAGX vs VRLCX
RGAGX vs VRLCX Comparison
Open Charts RGAGX vs VRLCX
RGAGX vs VRLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGAGX vs. VRLCX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGAGX is a Buy and VRLCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. VRLCX (3.45B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than VRLCX: RGAGX (0.51) vs VRLCX (0.00). RGAGX was incepted earlier than VRLCX: RGAGX (17 years) vs VRLCX (11 years). VRLCX (0.68) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.29). VRLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. RGAGX (32.00). VRLCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAGX: VRLCX (0) vs RGAGX (250). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.49 vs. VRLCX (-3.20). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 15.00 vs. VRLCX (-19.22).
| RGAGX | VRLCX | RGAGX / VRLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 0.67 | 43% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 0.68 | 43% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.321 | -5.864 | -159% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 353B | 3.45B | 10,226% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.49 | -3.20 | -15% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.65 | 41.32 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.00 | -19.22 | -78% |
| Returns for 10 years | 110.30 | 7.91 | 1,394% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers