Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGAGX vs WFPDX
RGAGX vs WFPDX Comparison
Open Charts RGAGX vs WFPDX
RGAGX vs WFPDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGAGX vs. WFPDX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGAGX is a Hold and WFPDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 338B vs. WFPDX (1.39B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than WFPDX: RGAGX (0.51) vs WFPDX (0.00). RGAGX was incepted earlier than WFPDX: RGAGX (17 years) vs WFPDX (16 years). WFPDX (1.08) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.29). WFPDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 63.00 vs. RGAGX (32.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than WFPDX: RGAGX (250) vs WFPDX (1000000). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.57 vs. WFPDX (-8.03). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 25.33 vs. WFPDX (-38.77).
| RGAGX | WFPDX | RGAGX / WFPDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 1.00 | 29% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 1.08 | 27% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.240 | 7.324 | 140% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 338B | 1.39B | 24,299% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.57 | -8.03 | -181% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.81 | -10.50 | -522% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.33 | -38.77 | -65% |
| Returns for 10 years | 116.36 | -23.84 | -488% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers