Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGAGX vs WOFDX
RGAGX vs WOFDX Comparison
Open Charts RGAGX vs WOFDX
RGAGX vs WOFDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGAGX vs. WOFDX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGAGX is a StrongBuy and WOFDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. WOFDX (1.88B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than WOFDX: RGAGX (0.52) vs WOFDX (0.00). RGAGX was incepted earlier than WOFDX: RGAGX (17 years) vs WOFDX (24 years). WOFDX (1.12) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.29). RGAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. WOFDX (21.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than WOFDX: RGAGX (250) vs WOFDX (1000000). WOFDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.15 vs. RGAGX (1.96). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 15.08 vs. WOFDX (-2.86).
| RGAGX | WOFDX | RGAGX / WOFDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 1.00 | 29% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 1.12 | 26% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.796 | 8.831 | 66% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 357B | 1.88B | 18,969% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.52 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.96 | 4.15 | 47% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.42 | 16.27 | 230% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.08 | -2.86 | -528% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.10 | 46.81 | 220% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers