Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGAGX vs WOFDX
RGAGX vs WOFDX Comparison
Open Charts RGAGX vs WOFDX
RGAGX vs WOFDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGAGX vs. WOFDX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGAGX is a StrongBuy and WOFDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 342B vs. WOFDX (1.91B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than WOFDX: RGAGX (0.52) vs WOFDX (0.00). RGAGX was incepted earlier than WOFDX: RGAGX (17 years) vs WOFDX (24 years). WOFDX (1.12) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.29). RGAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. WOFDX (21.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than WOFDX: RGAGX (250) vs WOFDX (1000000). WOFDX (6.07) and RGAGX (5.99) have marching annual gain over last year. RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 19.07 vs. WOFDX (-0.52).
| RGAGX | WOFDX | RGAGX / WOFDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 1.00 | 29% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 1.12 | 26% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.656 | 11.128 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 342B | 1.91B | 17,906% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.52 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.99 | 6.07 | 99% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.02 | 24.59 | 199% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.07 | -0.52 | -3,683% |
| Returns for 10 years | 105.26 | 44.97 | 234% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers