Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGAGX vs WOFDX
RGAGX vs WOFDX Comparison
Open Charts RGAGX vs WOFDX
RGAGX vs WOFDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGAGX vs. WOFDX commentary
Jun 21, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGAGX is a Hold and WOFDX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. WOFDX (1.9B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than WOFDX: RGAGX (0.51) vs WOFDX (0.00). RGAGX was incepted earlier than WOFDX: RGAGX (17 years) vs WOFDX (24 years). WOFDX (1.12) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.29). RGAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. WOFDX (21.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than WOFDX: RGAGX (250) vs WOFDX (1000000). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.74 vs. WOFDX (9.76). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 23.74 vs. WOFDX (2.83).
| RGAGX | WOFDX | RGAGX / WOFDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 1.00 | 29% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 1.12 | 26% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.458 | 8.661 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 361B | 1.9B | 19,010% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.74 | 9.76 | 131% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.47 | 22.64 | 210% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.74 | 2.83 | 838% |
| Returns for 10 years | 117.20 | 49.31 | 238% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement