Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGAGX vs WOFNX
RGAGX vs WOFNX Comparison
Open Charts RGAGX vs WOFNX
RGAGX vs WOFNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGAGX vs. WOFNX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGAGX is a Hold and WOFNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 338B vs. WOFNX (1.91B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than WOFNX: RGAGX (0.51) vs WOFNX (0.00). RGAGX was incepted earlier than WOFNX: RGAGX (17 years) vs WOFNX (16 years). WOFNX (0.87) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.29). RGAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. WOFNX (21.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than WOFNX: RGAGX (250) vs WOFNX (1000000). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.41 vs. WOFNX (13.49). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 27.14 vs. WOFNX (6.83).
| RGAGX | WOFNX | RGAGX / WOFNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 0.75 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 0.87 | 33% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.599 | 8.821 | 120% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 338B | 1.91B | 17,659% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.41 | 13.49 | 114% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.31 | 28.60 | 193% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.14 | 6.83 | 397% |
| Returns for 10 years | 117.06 | 54.57 | 215% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement