Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGAGX vs WPSIX
RGAGX vs WPSIX Comparison
Open Charts RGAGX vs WPSIX
RGAGX vs WPSIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGAGX vs. WPSIX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGAGX is a Buy and WPSIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. WPSIX (422M). RGAGX pays higher dividends than WPSIX: RGAGX (0.51) vs WPSIX (0.00). RGAGX was incepted earlier than WPSIX: RGAGX (17 years) vs WPSIX (13 years). WPSIX (0.84) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.29). RGAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. WPSIX (18.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than WPSIX: RGAGX (250) vs WPSIX (2000000). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.49 vs. WPSIX (-15.05). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 15.00 vs. WPSIX (-21.91).
| RGAGX | WPSIX | RGAGX / WPSIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 0.83 | 35% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 0.84 | 35% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.321 | -6.130 | -152% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 353B | 422M | 83,649% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.49 | -15.05 | -3% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.65 | -2.75 | -1,621% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.00 | -21.91 | -68% |
| Returns for 10 years | 110.30 | 75.83 | 145% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers