Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGAGX vs WSACX
RGAGX vs WSACX Comparison
Open Charts RGAGX vs WSACX
RGAGX vs WSACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGAGX vs. WSACX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGAGX is a Buy and WSACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. WSACX (75.8M). RGAGX pays higher dividends than WSACX: RGAGX (0.51) vs WSACX (0.00). RGAGX was incepted earlier than WSACX: RGAGX (17 years) vs WSACX (32 years). WSACX (1.32) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.29). RGAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. WSACX (20.39). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than WSACX: RGAGX (250) vs WSACX (5000). WSACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.78 vs. RGAGX (0.49). WSACX return over 5 years is better than : 23.79 vs. RGAGX (15.00).
| RGAGX | WSACX | RGAGX / WSACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 1.32 | 22% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 1.32 | 22% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.321 | 13.924 | 67% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 5000 | 5% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 353B | 75.8M | 465,699% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.49 | 20.78 | 2% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.65 | 63.58 | 70% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.00 | 23.79 | 63% |
| Returns for 10 years | 110.30 | 56.88 | 194% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers