Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGAGX vs ZVNBX
RGAGX vs ZVNBX Comparison
Open Charts RGAGX vs ZVNBX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$86.35
Change+$0.53 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.53B
Zevenbergen Growth Investor
Price$42.57
Change+$0.55 (+1.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets143.21M
RGAGX vs ZVNBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGAGX vs. ZVNBX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGAGX is a Buy and ZVNBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 328B vs. ZVNBX (143M). RGAGX pays higher dividends than ZVNBX: RGAGX (0.60) vs ZVNBX (0.00). RGAGX was incepted earlier than ZVNBX: RGAGX (16 years) vs ZVNBX (10 years). ZVNBX (1.52) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.30). RGAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. ZVNBX (13.62). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than ZVNBX: RGAGX (250) vs ZVNBX (2500). ZVNBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.29 vs. RGAGX (16.26). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 39.74 vs. ZVNBX (22.79).
| RGAGX | ZVNBX | RGAGX / ZVNBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 1.30 | 23% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 1.52 | 20% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.828 | 11.076 | 143% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 328B | 143M | 229,371% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.60 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.26 | 29.29 | 56% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.92 | 92.14 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.74 | 22.79 | 174% |
| Returns for 10 years | 102.72 | 320.20 | 32% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers