Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGAGX vs ZVNBX
RGAGX vs ZVNBX Comparison
Open Charts RGAGX vs ZVNBX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$86.11
Change-$0.60 (-0.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.73B
Zevenbergen Growth Investor
Price$40.34
Change-$0.38 (-0.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets127.51M
RGAGX vs ZVNBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGAGX vs. ZVNBX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGAGX is a Hold and ZVNBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 330B vs. ZVNBX (128M). RGAGX pays higher dividends than ZVNBX: RGAGX (0.56) vs ZVNBX (0.00). RGAGX was incepted earlier than ZVNBX: RGAGX (17 years) vs ZVNBX (10 years). ZVNBX (1.52) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.30). RGAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. ZVNBX (15.24). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than ZVNBX: RGAGX (250) vs ZVNBX (2500). ZVNBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.38 vs. RGAGX (7.56). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 34.75 vs. ZVNBX (7.55).
| RGAGX | ZVNBX | RGAGX / ZVNBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 1.30 | 23% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 1.52 | 20% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.506 | 7.639 | 203% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 330B | 128M | 257,813% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.56 | 8.38 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.18 | 113.42 | 56% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.75 | 7.55 | 460% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.31 | 295.72 | 31% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement