Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGAGX vs ZVNBX
RGAGX vs ZVNBX Comparison
Open Charts RGAGX vs ZVNBX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$89.59
Change+$0.67 (+0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.58B
Zevenbergen Growth Investor
Price$44.35
Change+$1.00 (+2.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets136.71M
RGAGX vs ZVNBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGAGX vs. ZVNBX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGAGX is a Buy and ZVNBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 341B vs. ZVNBX (137M). RGAGX pays higher dividends than ZVNBX: RGAGX (0.58) vs ZVNBX (0.00). RGAGX was incepted earlier than ZVNBX: RGAGX (16 years) vs ZVNBX (10 years). ZVNBX (1.52) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.30). RGAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. ZVNBX (13.62). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than ZVNBX: RGAGX (250) vs ZVNBX (2500). ZVNBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.96 vs. RGAGX (15.21). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 44.18 vs. ZVNBX (15.26).
| RGAGX | ZVNBX | RGAGX / ZVNBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 1.30 | 23% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 1.52 | 20% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.174 | 14.592 | 138% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 341B | 137M | 248,905% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.58 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.21 | 23.96 | 63% |
| Returns for 3 years | 77.47 | 123.22 | 63% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.18 | 15.26 | 289% |
| Returns for 10 years | 108.40 | 340.55 | 32% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers