Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGAGX vs ZVNBX
RGAGX vs ZVNBX Comparison
Open Charts RGAGX vs ZVNBX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$88.26
Change-$0.42 (-0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.23B
Zevenbergen Growth Investor
Price$42.98
Change+$0.04 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets147.04M
RGAGX vs ZVNBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGAGX vs. ZVNBX commentary
Sep 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGAGX is a Buy and ZVNBX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. ZVNBX (147M). RGAGX pays higher dividends than ZVNBX: RGAGX (0.59) vs ZVNBX (0.00). RGAGX was incepted earlier than ZVNBX: RGAGX (16 years) vs ZVNBX (10 years). ZVNBX (1.52) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.30). RGAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. ZVNBX (13.62). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than ZVNBX: RGAGX (250) vs ZVNBX (2500). ZVNBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.64 vs. RGAGX (17.20). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 50.30 vs. ZVNBX (31.76).
| RGAGX | ZVNBX | RGAGX / ZVNBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 1.30 | 23% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 1.52 | 20% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.390 | 13.508 | 136% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 340B | 147M | 231,293% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.59 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.20 | 28.64 | 60% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.83 | 99.07 | 64% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.30 | 31.76 | 158% |
| Returns for 10 years | 106.96 | 325.57 | 33% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement