Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGAHX vs RRBGX
RGAHX vs RRBGX Comparison
Open Charts RGAHX vs RRBGX
RGAHX vs RRBGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGAHX vs. RRBGX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGAHX is a Buy and RRBGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. RRBGX (61.3B). RGAHX pays higher dividends than RRBGX: RGAHX (0.40) vs RRBGX (0.00). RGAHX was incepted earlier than RRBGX: RGAHX (11 years) vs RRBGX (24 years). RRBGX (1.21) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). RGAHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. RRBGX (18.30). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than RRBGX: RGAHX (250) vs RRBGX (2500). RGAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.18 vs. RRBGX (-1.87). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 13.78 vs. RRBGX (1.88).
| RGAHX | RRBGX | RGAHX / RRBGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 1.21 | 36% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 1.21 | 36% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.200 | -0.144 | -6,388% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 353B | 61.3B | 576% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.40 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.18 | -1.87 | -10% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.47 | 44.14 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.78 | 1.88 | 734% |
| Returns for 10 years | 106.68 | 175.20 | 61% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers