Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGAHX vs SBRAX
RGAHX vs SBRAX Comparison
Open Charts RGAHX vs SBRAX
RGAHX vs SBRAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGAHX vs. SBRAX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGAHX is a Hold and SBRAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. SBRAX (48.8M). RGAHX pays higher dividends than SBRAX: RGAHX (0.39) vs SBRAX (0.04). RGAHX was incepted earlier than SBRAX: RGAHX (11 years) vs SBRAX (7 years). SBRAX (2.07) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). SBRAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. RGAHX (32.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than SBRAX: RGAHX (250) vs SBRAX (2500). RGAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.70 vs. SBRAX (-5.68). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 16.22 vs. SBRAX (-23.24).
| RGAHX | SBRAX | RGAHX / SBRAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.99 | 44% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 2.07 | 21% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.424 | 11.750 | 55% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 361B | 48.8M | 739,754% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.39 | 0.04 | 1,081% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.70 | -5.68 | -153% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.89 | -3.69 | -1,244% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.22 | -23.24 | -70% |
| Returns for 10 years | 113.43 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement