Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGAHX vs SGFCX
RGAHX vs SGFCX Comparison
Open Charts RGAHX vs SGFCX
RGAHX vs SGFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGAHX vs. SGFCX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGAHX is a Buy and SGFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. SGFCX (72.9M). RGAHX pays higher dividends than SGFCX: RGAHX (0.40) vs SGFCX (0.00). RGAHX was incepted earlier than SGFCX: RGAHX (11 years) vs SGFCX (15 years). SGFCX (2.28) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). RGAHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. SGFCX (2.25). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than SGFCX: RGAHX (250) vs SGFCX (1000). SGFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.84 vs. RGAHX (0.18). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 13.78 vs. SGFCX (1.93).
| RGAHX | SGFCX | RGAHX / SGFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 2.28 | 19% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 2.28 | 19% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.200 | 0.966 | 953% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 353B | 72.9M | 484,225% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.40 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.18 | 0.84 | 21% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.47 | 62.08 | 70% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.78 | 1.93 | 714% |
| Returns for 10 years | 106.68 | 198.88 | 54% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement