Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGAHX vs SSTFX
RGAHX vs SSTFX Comparison
Open Charts RGAHX vs SSTFX
RGAHX vs SSTFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGAHX vs. SSTFX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGAHX is a Buy and SSTFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. SSTFX (630M). RGAHX pays higher dividends than SSTFX: RGAHX (0.40) vs SSTFX (0.00). RGAHX was incepted earlier than SSTFX: RGAHX (11 years) vs SSTFX (29 years). SSTFX (2.01) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). RGAHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. SSTFX (12.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSTFX: RGAHX (250) vs SSTFX (2500). RGAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.18 vs. SSTFX (-14.50). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 13.78 vs. SSTFX (-54.99).
| RGAHX | SSTFX | RGAHX / SSTFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 2.01 | 22% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 2.01 | 22% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.200 | 0.617 | 1,492% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 353B | 630M | 56,032% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.40 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.18 | -14.50 | -1% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.47 | -12.04 | -361% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.78 | -54.99 | -25% |
| Returns for 10 years | 106.68 | -15.75 | -677% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement