Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGAHX vs TCPWX
RGAHX vs TCPWX Comparison
Open Charts RGAHX vs TCPWX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5E
Price$87.22
Change+$0.62 (+0.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets337.84B
Transamerica Capital Growth R6
Price$15.16
Change+$0.29 (+1.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.71B
RGAHX vs TCPWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGAHX vs. TCPWX commentary
Sep 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGAHX is a Buy and TCPWX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 338B vs. TCPWX (1.71B). RGAHX pays higher dividends than TCPWX: RGAHX (0.46) vs TCPWX (0.00). RGAHX was incepted earlier than TCPWX: RGAHX (10 years) vs TCPWX (6 years). TCPWX (0.74) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). RGAHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. TCPWX (20.00). TCPWX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAHX: TCPWX (0) vs RGAHX (250). TCPWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 73.51 vs. RGAHX (17.06). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 46.38 vs. TCPWX (-25.50).
| RGAHX | TCPWX | RGAHX / TCPWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.74 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.74 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.919 | 31.360 | 57% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 338B | 1.71B | 19,755% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.46 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.06 | 73.51 | 23% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.47 | 128.77 | 49% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.38 | -25.50 | -182% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement