Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGAHX vs TCPWX
RGAHX vs TCPWX Comparison
Open Charts RGAHX vs TCPWX
RGAHX vs TCPWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGAHX vs. TCPWX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGAHX is a Buy and TCPWX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. TCPWX (1.26B). RGAHX pays higher dividends than TCPWX: RGAHX (0.40) vs TCPWX (0.00). RGAHX was incepted earlier than TCPWX: RGAHX (11 years) vs TCPWX (7 years). TCPWX (0.73) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). TCPWX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. RGAHX (32.00). TCPWX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAHX: TCPWX (0) vs RGAHX (250). RGAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.43 vs. TCPWX (3.68). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 16.49 vs. TCPWX (-43.77).
| RGAHX | TCPWX | RGAHX / TCPWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.73 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.73 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.244 | -1.096 | -661% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 357B | 1.26B | 28,356% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.40 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.43 | 3.68 | 120% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.88 | 83.97 | 47% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.49 | -43.77 | -38% |
| Returns for 10 years | 102.84 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement