Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGAHX vs TRBCX
RGAHX vs TRBCX Comparison
Open Charts RGAHX vs TRBCX
RGAHX vs TRBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGAHX vs. TRBCX commentary
Sep 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGAHX is a Buy and TRBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. TRBCX (61.7B). RGAHX pays higher dividends than TRBCX: RGAHX (0.40) vs TRBCX (0.00). RGAHX was incepted earlier than TRBCX: RGAHX (11 years) vs TRBCX (33 years). TRBCX (0.70) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). RGAHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. TRBCX (18.30). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRBCX: RGAHX (250) vs TRBCX (2500). RGAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.18 vs. TRBCX (-0.05). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 13.78 vs. TRBCX (7.63).
| RGAHX | TRBCX | RGAHX / TRBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.70 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.70 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.200 | 0.937 | 982% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 353B | 61.7B | 572% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.40 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.18 | -0.05 | -347% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.47 | 49.54 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.78 | 7.63 | 181% |
| Returns for 10 years | 106.68 | 198.38 | 54% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers