Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGAHX vs TRBCX
RGAHX vs TRBCX Comparison
Open Charts RGAHX vs TRBCX
RGAHX vs TRBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGAHX vs. TRBCX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGAHX is a Hold and TRBCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. TRBCX (64.7B). RGAHX pays higher dividends than TRBCX: RGAHX (0.39) vs TRBCX (0.00). RGAHX was incepted earlier than TRBCX: RGAHX (11 years) vs TRBCX (33 years). TRBCX (0.70) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). RGAHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. TRBCX (18.30). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRBCX: RGAHX (250) vs TRBCX (2500). TRBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.56 vs. RGAHX (8.70). RGAHX (16.22) and TRBCX (15.93) have equivalent 5 years return.
| RGAHX | TRBCX | RGAHX / TRBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.70 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.70 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.424 | 1.816 | 354% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 361B | 64.7B | 558% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.39 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.70 | 12.56 | 69% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.89 | 56.25 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.22 | 15.93 | 102% |
| Returns for 10 years | 113.43 | 221.99 | 51% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement