Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGAHX vs VWUSX
RGAHX vs VWUSX Comparison
Open Charts RGAHX vs VWUSX
RGAHX vs VWUSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGAHX vs. VWUSX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGAHX is a Buy and VWUSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. VWUSX (44B). RGAHX pays higher dividends than VWUSX: RGAHX (0.40) vs VWUSX (0.06). RGAHX was incepted earlier than VWUSX: RGAHX (11 years) vs VWUSX (68 years). RGAHX (0.44) is less costly to investors than VWUSX (0.35). RGAHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. VWUSX (29.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than VWUSX: RGAHX (250) vs VWUSX (3000). RGAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.18 vs. VWUSX (-7.87). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 13.78 vs. VWUSX (-0.69).
| RGAHX | VWUSX | RGAHX / VWUSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.35 | 126% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.35 | 126% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 68 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.200 | 0.239 | 3,850% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 3000 | 8% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 353B | 44B | 802% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.40 | 0.06 | 667% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.18 | -7.87 | -2% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.47 | 45.79 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.78 | -0.69 | -2,001% |
| Returns for 10 years | 106.68 | 152.88 | 70% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement