Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGAHX vs WLGAX
RGAHX vs WLGAX Comparison
Open Charts RGAHX vs WLGAX
RGAHX vs WLGAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGAHX vs. WLGAX commentary
Jul 27, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGAHX is a Hold and WLGAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. WLGAX (6.14B). RGAHX pays higher dividends than WLGAX: RGAHX (0.40) vs WLGAX (0.00). RGAHX was incepted earlier than WLGAX: RGAHX (11 years) vs WLGAX (26 years). WLGAX (0.97) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). RGAHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. WLGAX (24.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than WLGAX: RGAHX (250) vs WLGAX (1000). RGAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.41 vs. WLGAX (-7.29). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 11.23 vs. WLGAX (2.49).
| RGAHX | WLGAX | RGAHX / WLGAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.89 | 49% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.97 | 45% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.887 | -1.754 | -222% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 357B | 6.14B | 5,818% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.40 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.41 | -7.29 | 6% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.06 | 23.50 | 149% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.23 | 2.49 | 451% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.26 | 94.78 | 102% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement