Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGAHX vs WSACX
RGAHX vs WSACX Comparison
Open Charts RGAHX vs WSACX
RGAHX vs WSACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGAHX vs. WSACX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGAHX is a Hold and WSACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 338B vs. WSACX (77.8M). RGAHX pays higher dividends than WSACX: RGAHX (0.39) vs WSACX (0.00). RGAHX was incepted earlier than WSACX: RGAHX (11 years) vs WSACX (31 years). WSACX (1.32) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). RGAHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. WSACX (20.39). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than WSACX: RGAHX (250) vs WSACX (5000). WSACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 37.28 vs. RGAHX (15.06). WSACX return over 5 years is better than : 35.57 vs. RGAHX (25.77).
| RGAHX | WSACX | RGAHX / WSACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 1.32 | 33% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 1.32 | 33% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.512 | 16.824 | 62% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 5000 | 5% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 338B | 77.8M | 434,447% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.39 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.06 | 37.28 | 40% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.07 | 76.13 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.77 | 35.57 | 72% |
| Returns for 10 years | 113.26 | 65.83 | 172% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement