Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGAHX vs ZVNBX
RGAHX vs ZVNBX Comparison
Open Charts RGAHX vs ZVNBX
RGAHX vs ZVNBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGAHX vs. ZVNBX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGAHX is a Hold and ZVNBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. ZVNBX (134M). RGAHX pays higher dividends than ZVNBX: RGAHX (0.39) vs ZVNBX (0.00). RGAHX was incepted earlier than ZVNBX: RGAHX (11 years) vs ZVNBX (11 years). ZVNBX (1.46) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). RGAHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. ZVNBX (15.24). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than ZVNBX: RGAHX (250) vs ZVNBX (2500). RGAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.70 vs. ZVNBX (0.45). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 16.22 vs. ZVNBX (-3.99).
| RGAHX | ZVNBX | RGAHX / ZVNBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 1.30 | 34% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 1.46 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.424 | -0.066 | -9,807% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 361B | 134M | 269,403% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.39 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.70 | 0.45 | 1,941% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.89 | 61.52 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.22 | -3.99 | -406% |
| Returns for 10 years | 113.43 | 367.99 | 31% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement