Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGEBX vs RGWCX
RGEBX vs RGWCX Comparison
Open Charts RGEBX vs RGWCX
RGEBX vs RGWCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGEBX vs. RGWCX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGEBX is a Buy and RGWCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. RGWCX (379M). RGEBX (0.00) and RGWCX (0.00) have matching dividends . RGEBX was incepted earlier than RGWCX: RGEBX (12 years) vs RGWCX (19 years). RGWCX (3.84) is less costly to investors than RGEBX (1.08). RGEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. RGWCX (24.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGWCX: RGEBX (250) vs RGWCX (2500). RGWCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.36 vs. RGEBX (-0.77). RGWCX return over 5 years is better than : 17.17 vs. RGEBX (9.71).
| RGEBX | RGWCX | RGEBX / RGWCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 1.93 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 3.84 | 28% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.727 | 4.179 | 209% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 353B | 379M | 93,140% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.77 | 0.36 | -216% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.77 | 48.47 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.71 | 17.17 | 57% |
| Returns for 10 years | 97.58 | 59.67 | 164% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement