Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGEBX vs SCATX
RGEBX vs SCATX Comparison
Open Charts RGEBX vs SCATX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$82.38
Change+$0.43 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.37B
Virtus Zevenbergen Innovative Gr Stk I
Price$62.79
Change+$0.96 (+1.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets475.4M
RGEBX vs SCATX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGEBX vs. SCATX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGEBX is a Hold and SCATX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 327B vs. SCATX (475M). RGEBX (0.00) and SCATX (0.00) have matching dividends . RGEBX was incepted earlier than SCATX: RGEBX (11 years) vs SCATX (22 years). SCATX (1.10) and RGEBX (1.09) have similar cost to investors . RGEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. SCATX (13.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than SCATX: RGEBX (250) vs SCATX (100000). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.15 vs. SCATX (5.39). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 30.81 vs. SCATX (3.88).
| RGEBX | SCATX | RGEBX / SCATX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.00 | 109% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.10 | 99% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.314 | 6.567 | 233% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 327B | 475M | 68,842% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.15 | 5.39 | 114% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.18 | 115.36 | 52% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.81 | 3.88 | 794% |
| Returns for 10 years | 81.54 | 169.88 | 48% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement