Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGEBX vs SCATX
RGEBX vs SCATX Comparison
Open Charts RGEBX vs SCATX
RGEBX vs SCATX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGEBX vs. SCATX commentary
Jul 11, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGEBX is a Buy and SCATX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. SCATX (383M). RGEBX (0.00) and SCATX (0.00) have matching dividends . RGEBX was incepted earlier than SCATX: RGEBX (12 years) vs SCATX (22 years). SCATX (1.09) and RGEBX (1.08) have similar cost to investors . RGEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. SCATX (22.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than SCATX: RGEBX (250) vs SCATX (100000). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.65 vs. SCATX (1.51). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 13.39 vs. SCATX (-2.18).
| RGEBX | SCATX | RGEBX / SCATX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 1.00 | 108% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 1.09 | 99% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.609 | 1.142 | 754% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 357B | 383M | 93,211% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.65 | 1.51 | 309% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.18 | 63.46 | 65% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.39 | -2.18 | -615% |
| Returns for 10 years | 97.60 | 228.32 | 43% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement