Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGEBX vs STCZX
RGEBX vs STCZX Comparison
Open Charts RGEBX vs STCZX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$81.56
Change-$0.76 (-0.92%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.04B
Virtus Silvant Large-Cap Growth Stk R6
Price$17.60
Change-$0.17 (-0.96%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets248.26M
RGEBX vs STCZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGEBX vs. STCZX commentary
Sep 02, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGEBX is a Buy and STCZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. STCZX (248M). RGEBX (0.00) and STCZX (0.00) have matching dividends . RGEBX was incepted earlier than STCZX: RGEBX (11 years) vs STCZX (11 years). RGEBX (1.09) is less costly to investors than STCZX (0.92). RGEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. STCZX (12.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than STCZX: RGEBX (250) vs STCZX (2500000). STCZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.71 vs. RGEBX (13.67). STCZX return over 5 years is better than : 69.56 vs. RGEBX (33.24).
| RGEBX | STCZX | RGEBX / STCZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.72 | 151% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.92 | 118% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.166 | 11.746 | 121% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 329B | 248M | 132,661% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.67 | 20.71 | 66% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.58 | 94.91 | 55% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.24 | 69.56 | 48% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.86 | 78.32 | 121% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement