Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGEBX vs STCZX
RGEBX vs STCZX Comparison
Open Charts RGEBX vs STCZX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$80.26
Change+$0.70 (+0.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets324.74B
Virtus Silvant Large-Cap Growth Stk R6
Price$17.45
Change+$0.19 (+1.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets246.24M
RGEBX vs STCZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGEBX vs. STCZX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGEBX is a Hold and STCZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 325B vs. STCZX (246M). RGEBX (0.00) and STCZX (0.00) have matching dividends . RGEBX was incepted earlier than STCZX: RGEBX (11 years) vs STCZX (11 years). RGEBX (1.09) is less costly to investors than STCZX (0.92). RGEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. STCZX (12.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than STCZX: RGEBX (250) vs STCZX (2500000). STCZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.85 vs. RGEBX (19.90). STCZX return over 5 years is better than : 78.67 vs. RGEBX (39.18).
| RGEBX | STCZX | RGEBX / STCZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.72 | 151% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.92 | 118% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.346 | 9.587 | 129% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 325B | 246M | 132,114% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.90 | 27.85 | 71% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.68 | 79.05 | 55% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.18 | 78.67 | 50% |
| Returns for 10 years | 78.71 | 60.86 | 129% |