Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGEBX vs VWUAX
RGEBX vs VWUAX Comparison
Open Charts RGEBX vs VWUAX
RGEBX vs VWUAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGEBX vs. VWUAX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGEBX is a Buy and VWUAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. VWUAX (44B). VWUAX pays higher dividends than RGEBX: VWUAX (0.17) vs RGEBX (0.00). RGEBX was incepted earlier than VWUAX: RGEBX (12 years) vs VWUAX (25 years). RGEBX (1.08) is less costly to investors than VWUAX (0.25). RGEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. VWUAX (29.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than VWUAX: RGEBX (250) vs VWUAX (50000). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.77 vs. VWUAX (-7.89). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 9.71 vs. VWUAX (-0.59).
| RGEBX | VWUAX | RGEBX / VWUAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.25 | 432% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.25 | 432% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.727 | 0.313 | 2,791% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 50000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 353B | 44B | 802% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.17 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.77 | -7.89 | 10% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.77 | 45.92 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.71 | -0.59 | -1,642% |
| Returns for 10 years | 97.58 | 153.26 | 64% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement