Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGEBX vs VWUAX
RGEBX vs VWUAX Comparison
Open Charts RGEBX vs VWUAX
RGEBX vs VWUAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGEBX vs. VWUAX commentary
Jun 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGEBX is a Hold and VWUAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. VWUAX (47.5B). VWUAX pays higher dividends than RGEBX: VWUAX (0.16) vs RGEBX (0.00). RGEBX was incepted earlier than VWUAX: RGEBX (12 years) vs VWUAX (25 years). RGEBX (1.08) is less costly to investors than VWUAX (0.25). RGEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. VWUAX (29.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than VWUAX: RGEBX (250) vs VWUAX (50000). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.13 vs. VWUAX (4.03). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 15.42 vs. VWUAX (6.42).
| RGEBX | VWUAX | RGEBX / VWUAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.25 | 432% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.25 | 432% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.479 | 1.487 | 570% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 50000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 361B | 47.5B | 760% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.16 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.13 | 4.03 | 276% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.29 | 52.52 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.42 | 6.42 | 240% |
| Returns for 10 years | 108.69 | 172.74 | 63% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement