Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGEBX vs WLCGX
RGEBX vs WLCGX Comparison
Open Charts RGEBX vs WLCGX
RGEBX vs WLCGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGEBX vs. WLCGX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGEBX is a Buy and WLCGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. WLCGX (283M). WLCGX pays higher dividends than RGEBX: WLCGX (0.11) vs RGEBX (0.00). RGEBX was incepted earlier than WLCGX: RGEBX (12 years) vs WLCGX (30 years). RGEBX (1.08) is less costly to investors than WLCGX (1.00). WLCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 104.00 vs. RGEBX (32.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than WLCGX: RGEBX (250) vs WLCGX (250000). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.42 vs. WLCGX (1.11). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 12.32 vs. WLCGX (-0.19).
| RGEBX | WLCGX | RGEBX / WLCGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 1.00 | 108% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 1.00 | 108% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.888 | 7.730 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 357B | 283M | 126,148% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.11 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.42 | 1.11 | 307% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.26 | 46.28 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.32 | -0.19 | -6,510% |
| Returns for 10 years | 93.96 | 42.91 | 219% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers