Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGEBX vs WLGCX
RGEBX vs WLGCX Comparison
Open Charts RGEBX vs WLGCX
RGEBX vs WLGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGEBX vs. WLGCX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGEBX is a Hold and WLGCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. WLGCX (6.17B). RGEBX (0.00) and WLGCX (0.00) have matching dividends . RGEBX was incepted earlier than WLGCX: RGEBX (12 years) vs WLGCX (26 years). WLGCX (1.72) is less costly to investors than RGEBX (1.08). RGEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. WLGCX (18.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than WLGCX: RGEBX (250) vs WLGCX (1000). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.66 vs. WLGCX (-5.15). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 12.07 vs. WLGCX (-7.61).
| RGEBX | WLGCX | RGEBX / WLGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 1.64 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 1.72 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.118 | -1.638 | -374% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 361B | 6.17B | 5,853% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.66 | -5.15 | -149% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.13 | 18.42 | 229% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.07 | -7.61 | -159% |
| Returns for 10 years | 104.15 | 54.92 | 190% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement