Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGEBX vs WLGCX
RGEBX vs WLGCX Comparison
Open Charts RGEBX vs WLGCX
RGEBX vs WLGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGEBX vs. WLGCX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGEBX is a Buy and WLGCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. WLGCX (6.36B). RGEBX (0.00) and WLGCX (0.00) have matching dividends . RGEBX was incepted earlier than WLGCX: RGEBX (12 years) vs WLGCX (26 years). WLGCX (1.72) is less costly to investors than RGEBX (1.08). RGEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. WLGCX (24.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than WLGCX: RGEBX (250) vs WLGCX (1000). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.42 vs. WLGCX (-7.15). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 12.32 vs. WLGCX (-9.80).
| RGEBX | WLGCX | RGEBX / WLGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 1.64 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 1.72 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.888 | 0.819 | 841% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 357B | 6.36B | 5,616% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.42 | -7.15 | -48% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.26 | 16.77 | 216% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.32 | -9.80 | -126% |
| Returns for 10 years | 93.96 | 50.13 | 187% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement