Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGEBX vs WLGCX
RGEBX vs WLGCX Comparison
Open Charts RGEBX vs WLGCX
RGEBX vs WLGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGEBX vs. WLGCX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGEBX is a Hold and WLGCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 338B vs. WLGCX (6.62B). RGEBX (0.00) and WLGCX (0.00) have matching dividends . RGEBX was incepted earlier than WLGCX: RGEBX (12 years) vs WLGCX (26 years). WLGCX (1.72) is less costly to investors than RGEBX (1.08). RGEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. WLGCX (18.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than WLGCX: RGEBX (250) vs WLGCX (1000). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.94 vs. WLGCX (-0.91). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 21.28 vs. WLGCX (1.02).
| RGEBX | WLGCX | RGEBX / WLGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 1.64 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 1.72 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.227 | 2.931 | 349% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 338B | 6.62B | 5,103% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.94 | -0.91 | -1,527% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.06 | 25.68 | 195% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.28 | 1.02 | 2,096% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.93 | 54.96 | 189% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement