Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGEBX vs WLGCX
RGEBX vs WLGCX Comparison
Open Charts RGEBX vs WLGCX
RGEBX vs WLGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGEBX vs. WLGCX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGEBX is a Buy and WLGCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. WLGCX (6.23B). RGEBX (0.00) and WLGCX (0.00) have matching dividends . RGEBX was incepted earlier than WLGCX: RGEBX (12 years) vs WLGCX (26 years). WLGCX (1.73) is less costly to investors than RGEBX (1.08). RGEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. WLGCX (24.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than WLGCX: RGEBX (250) vs WLGCX (1000). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.77 vs. WLGCX (-8.47). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 9.71 vs. WLGCX (-10.91).
| RGEBX | WLGCX | RGEBX / WLGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 1.64 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 1.73 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.727 | 2.457 | 355% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 353B | 6.23B | 5,671% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.77 | -8.47 | 9% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.77 | 21.46 | 185% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.71 | -10.91 | -89% |
| Returns for 10 years | 97.58 | 51.98 | 188% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement