Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGEBX vs WLGYX
RGEBX vs WLGYX Comparison
Open Charts RGEBX vs WLGYX
RGEBX vs WLGYX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGEBX vs. WLGYX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGEBX is a Buy and WLGYX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. WLGYX (6.23B). RGEBX (0.00) and WLGYX (0.00) have matching dividends . RGEBX was incepted earlier than WLGYX: RGEBX (12 years) vs WLGYX (26 years). RGEBX (1.08) is less costly to investors than WLGYX (0.98). RGEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. WLGYX (24.00). WLGYX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGEBX: WLGYX (0) vs RGEBX (250). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.77 vs. WLGYX (-3.36). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 9.71 vs. WLGYX (7.25).
| RGEBX | WLGYX | RGEBX / WLGYX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.89 | 121% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.98 | 110% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.727 | 2.955 | 295% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 353B | 6.23B | 5,671% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.77 | -3.36 | 23% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.77 | 33.37 | 119% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.71 | 7.25 | 134% |
| Returns for 10 years | 97.58 | 110.99 | 88% |