Ad is loading...
RGEBX vs WMKGX
RGEBX vs WMKGX Comparison
Open Charts RGEBX vs WMKGX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$64.09
Change-$3.82 (-5.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets279.82B
WesMark Large Company Fund
Price$20.31
Change-$1.27 (-5.89%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets312.8M
RGEBX vs WMKGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGEBX vs. WMKGX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGEBX is a Buy and WMKGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 280B vs. WMKGX (313M). WMKGX pays higher dividends than RGEBX: WMKGX (0.07) vs RGEBX (0.00). RGEBX was incepted earlier than WMKGX: RGEBX (11 years) vs WMKGX (28 years). WMKGX (1.12) and RGEBX (1.09) have similar cost to investors . RGEBX (25.00) and WMKGX (24.00) have comparable annual turnover. RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than WMKGX: RGEBX (250) vs WMKGX (1000). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.53 vs. WMKGX (-8.10). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 66.95 vs. WMKGX (41.34).
| RGEBX | WMKGX | RGEBX / WMKGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.12 | 97% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.12 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.941 | -6.102 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 280B | 313M | 89,457% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.53 | -8.10 | 7% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.55 | -13.78 | -26% |
| Returns for 5 years | 66.95 | 41.34 | 162% |
| Returns for 10 years | 53.92 | 13.66 | 395% |