Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGEBX vs WMKGX
RGEBX vs WMKGX Comparison
Open Charts RGEBX vs WMKGX
RGEBX vs WMKGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGEBX vs. WMKGX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGEBX is a Buy and WMKGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. WMKGX (367M). RGEBX (0.00) and WMKGX (0.00) have matching dividends . RGEBX was incepted earlier than WMKGX: RGEBX (12 years) vs WMKGX (29 years). WMKGX (1.14) is less costly to investors than RGEBX (1.08). RGEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. WMKGX (25.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than WMKGX: RGEBX (250) vs WMKGX (1000). WMKGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.28 vs. RGEBX (-0.77). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 9.71 vs. WMKGX (-8.53).
| RGEBX | WMKGX | RGEBX / WMKGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 1.14 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 1.14 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.727 | 14.182 | 62% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 353B | 367M | 96,185% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.77 | -0.28 | 279% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.77 | 17.57 | 226% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.71 | -8.53 | -114% |
| Returns for 10 years | 97.58 | 46.37 | 210% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement