Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGEBX vs WMKGX
RGEBX vs WMKGX Comparison
Open Charts RGEBX vs WMKGX
RGEBX vs WMKGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGEBX vs. WMKGX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGEBX is a Buy and WMKGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. WMKGX (367M). RGEBX (0.00) and WMKGX (0.00) have matching dividends . RGEBX was incepted earlier than WMKGX: RGEBX (12 years) vs WMKGX (29 years). WMKGX (1.14) is less costly to investors than RGEBX (1.08). RGEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. WMKGX (25.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than WMKGX: RGEBX (250) vs WMKGX (1000). WMKGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.03 vs. RGEBX (3.42). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 12.32 vs. WMKGX (-7.82).
| RGEBX | WMKGX | RGEBX / WMKGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 1.14 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 1.14 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.888 | 13.457 | 51% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 357B | 367M | 97,275% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.42 | 5.03 | 68% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.26 | 16.33 | 222% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.32 | -7.82 | -158% |
| Returns for 10 years | 93.96 | 43.64 | 215% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement