Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGLAX vs RWIBX
RGLAX vs RWIBX Comparison
Open Charts RGLAX vs RWIBX
RGLAX vs RWIBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGLAX vs. RWIBX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGLAX is a Hold and RWIBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWIBX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. RGLAX (21.5B). RWIBX pays higher dividends than RGLAX: RWIBX (0.74) vs RGLAX (0.26). RGLAX was incepted earlier than RWIBX: RGLAX (7 years) vs RWIBX (24 years). RGLAX (1.51) and RWIBX (1.51) have similar cost to investors . RWIBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RGLAX (35.00). RGLAX (250) and RWIBX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RGLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.51 vs. RWIBX (17.83). RGLAX return over 5 years is better than : 51.22 vs. RWIBX (27.84).
| RGLAX | RWIBX | RGLAX / RWIBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 1.51 | 100% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 1.51 | 100% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.127 | 13.017 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 21.5B | 160B | 13% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.26 | 0.74 | 35% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.51 | 17.83 | 132% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.14 | 46.73 | 122% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.22 | 27.84 | 184% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 98.11 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement